SECTION IX Chapter 2. The Mormon Christian Church, or Church of Latter-Day Saints "I asked the personages [God and Jesus] who stood above me in the light which of all the [Christian] sects was right -- and which I should join. I was answered that I must join none of them, for they were all wrong, and the personage who addressed me said that all their creeds were an abomination in His sight: that those professors were all corrupt; that 'they draw near to me with their lips, but their hearts are far from me; they teach for doctrines the commandments of men: having a form of godliness, but they deny the power thereof'. --Joseph Smith (recounting his first vision in 1820) "Take away the Book of Mormon and the revelations, and where is our religion? We have none". --Joseph Smith (Joseph Smith, Ed., TEACHINGS OF THE PROPHET JOSEPH SMITH, 3rd ed. (Bountiful, Utah: Restoration Research, 1982)) The Mormon movement began in 1828 in Fayette, New York, after Joseph Smith (prophet to Mormonism) received a series of heavenly visitations that convinced him that all other religions were false, and that the "true" gospel was about to be restored. An angel of the lord later led Smith to discover ancient golden plates that had been buried under a hill near his home in the state of New York. According to Smith, these golden plates recorded the history of ancient Hebrew tribes who had sailed to America--and whose descendants had became the American Indians. Because the text on the golden plates were written in a hieroglyphic style of writing, Joseph Smith used his "seer stone" (which, in previous years he had used to locate buried treasure) to assist him in translating the golden plates. Unfortunately per Smith, he was not able to keep these golden plates as evidence of his visitation--because the angel carried them off with him to heaven, immediately after Smith had finished translating them. The BOOK OF MORMON, which is the translation made from these plates by Joseph Smith, tells the story of how hebrew tribes had emigrated to the New World. The first group (the Jaredites) had sailed to the New World in boats that were 'tight like unto a dish' after the Tower of Babel incident (ie when God confounded the languages of mankind.) After many generations, the Jaredites became sinful, and eventually destroyed each other after a series of wars. The second wave of Hebrew immigration to the New World were descendants of Lehi, a prophet who was warned by God to flee Jerusalem, just before its capture by the Babylonians in 587 BC. Escaping to America in their boats, the ancient hebrews repopulated the continent, forming two tribes-- the Nephites and the Lamanites. According to the BOOK OF MORMON, the Lamanites did "dwindle in unbelief" and consequently "God did cause a skin of blackness to come upon them." Cursed by God, they became "dark and loathsome... an idle people, full of mischief and subtlety." (George D. Smith, "Joseph Smith and the Book of Mormon", FREE INQUIRY, who in turn is quoting the curse of the "skin of blackness" in 1 Nephi 12:23; 2 Nephi 5:21-24; Jacob 3:5,9; Alma 3:6-10). The Nephites, on the other hand, remained faithful to God and as a consequence, retained their white skin. According to the BOOK OF MORMON, after Jesus was resurrected from the cross, he made a special visit to the Nephites in America. There, he gathered another twelve apostles --Nephi, Timothy, Jonas, Mathoni, Mathonihah, Kumen, Kumenonhi, Jeremiah, Shemnon, Jonas, Zedekiah, and Isaiah (3 Nephi 19:4)). There was a special Sermon on the Mount, a replay of the New Testament miracles, and a sacrament of bread and wine. (Ibid). Around 421 AD, the white Nephites were wiped out by the evil dark Lamanites, and it was one of their last survivors, Moroni--son of Mormon, who sealed up the history of their people which was recorded on the golden plates. (Indeed, per Smith, it was the dead Moroni, now in angel form, who had appeared to him and showed him where to find the lost golden plates). Background Against Which the BOOK OF MORMON was "Discovered" Prior to Joseph Smith's discovery of the BOOK OF MORMON, Deists and other skeptics (such as many Indians), had seriously questioned how Christianity could be THE one universal religion-- since no mention is EVER made in the Bible regarding the existance of the American continent or of American Indians. According to George D. Smith, the controversies among Protestant groups added to the uncertainty: "Unitarians rejected the trinitarian view of a three-person God. Deists rejected the biblical portrayal of an arbitrary, vindictive, and cruel God and advocated the study of nature as true theology. To counter the movement of "Rationalism", the churches launched the Second Great Awakening, a wave of revival meetings in search of spiritual conversions. There were claims of divine intervention and warnings of an imminent end to the world. William Miller announced in his Seventh-Day Adventists that Jesus would visit the earth in March 1843 and begin the millennium." Revivalist feelings were strong in western New York where Joseph Smith lived--and many people in the area had previously reported seeing visions and hearing voices. According to George D. Smith, "So intense and prolonged were the religious excitement and contention in western New York...at this time that it was called the 'burned-over' district." (Ibid p 23) The most powerful counter-argument made by conservative religious groups to the skeptical challenge of why Indians are not mentioned in the Bible--was to argue that the American Indians were NONE OTHER THAN A REMNANT OF THE LOST TRIBES OF ISRAEL! Among early American preachers putting forth this view were William Penn, Roger Williams, Cotton Mather, and Jonathan Edwards. Josiah Priest, wrote in 1825 (ie some five years before Joseph Smith translated the BOOK OF MORMON): "the opinion that the American Indians are descendants of the Lost Ten Tribes is now a popular one and generally believed." (Ibid, p 25 quoting Josiah Priest, WONDERS OF NATURE AND PROVIDENCE, DISPLAYED (Albany, 1825, 1826) plus other references cited) Thus, Joseph Smith's discovery of ancient hebrew plates seemed to confirm a view that was already very popular-- that Indians were one of the last tribes of hebrews--and that their dark skin arose from God's curse on them for their wickedness. (This tied in neatly with the observed fact that the Indians no longer worshiped the God of the Old Testament--or Jesus either). It also seemed to explain another enigma--the discovery of huge burial mounds made by ancient Indians. Since Napoleon's invasion of Egypt in 1799, there was a new fascination with Egyptian artifacts and hieroglyphics. To many, the shape of these burial mounds suggested the form of the ancient pyramids of Egypt. Some writers compared Egyptian hieroglyphics with Indian picture writing. The Growth of Early Mormonism Pictures of Joseph Smith show him to be very handsome and charismatic. On April 6, 1830, he took a group of sixty believers with him to Kirtland, Ohio. In the next two years, his base grew to over two thousand, and at the time of Joseph Smith's murder, the sect had grown to about twenty thousand. The Mormon apostle and missionary Orson Pratt gives some insight into the mindsets of some of Smith's early followers when he wrote in 1851: "The BOOK OF MORMON claims to be a divinely inspired record, written by a succession of prophets who inhabited Ancient America . . . "This book must be either true or false. If true, it is one of the most important messages ever sent from God to man... If false, it is one of the most cunning, wicked, bold, deep-laid impositions ever palmed upon the world... "The nature of the message in the BOOK OF MORMON is such, that if true, no one can possibly be saved and reject it..." (Ibid, p 21 citing Orson Pratt, "Divine Authenticity of the Book of Mormon," in ORSON PRATT'S WORKS (Liverpool: Pratt, 1851), p. 1.) Background of Joseph Smith Years before Joseph Smith had discovered the golden plates, he had routinely offered his services to "divine" the location of buried treasure. Poor farmers would pay Smith to place his "seer stone" in a hat, and look into it for a vision. Smith would then provide information on the location of the treasure, along with any warnings from the guardian spirit that was protecting the treasure. Sometimes elaborate rituals and incantations had to take place before actual digging began. Despite all his efforts, Smith never was able to recover any treasures for his client. Per Smith, this was because as soon as they got close to the treasure, the spirit would only bury it deeper. Smith however would still demand his fee. (Fawn M. Brodie, NO MAN KNOWS M HISTORY: THE LIFE OF JOSEPH SMITH, 2nd ed, (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, Inc. 1983) pp 16-30, 427-429. Also Ernest H. Taves, TROUBLE ENOUGH: JOSEPH SMITH AND THE BOOK OF MORMON (Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books, 1984), pp 17-31) Joseph Smith purportedly found his "seer-stone" which he described as "a chocolate colored, somewhat egg-shaped stone" when digging in a well in 1822. David Whitmer, a scribe of Joseph Smith and one of three witnesses to the divine translation of THE BOOK OF MORMON, described how Smith used this same seer-stone to translate the plates: "I will now give you a description of the manner in which the BOOK OF MORMON was translated. Joseph Smith would put the seer stone into a hat, and put his face in the hat, drawing it closely around his face to exclude the light; and in the darkness the spiritual light would shine. A piece of something resembling parchment would appear, and on that appeared the writing. One character at a time would appear, and under it was the interpretation in English. Brother Joseph would read off the English to Oliver Cowdery, who was his principal scribe, and when it was written down and repeated by Brother Joseph to see if it was correct, then it would disappear, and another character with the interpretation would appear. Thus the BOOK OF MORMON was translated by the gift and power of God, and not by any power of man". (David Whitmer, AN ADDRESS TO ALL BELIEVERS IN CHRIST (Richmond, Mo., 1887. ibid, p 27) Some two years before Smith switched his powers from locating buried treasure to holy writings, he was tried for disorderly conduct.-- He had failed to locate a lost silver mine for an established farmer in New York (for which Smith charged the fee of fourteen dollars a month). (George Smith, op cit, p 27, footnote 3) Joseph Smith's Family and Childhood By his own family's accounts, Joseph Smith was just one of many gifted members of the family. According to his mother's BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES OF JOSEPH SMITH, THE PROPHET, she had her own visions, as did Joseph's sister. A brother of hers (Joseph's uncle) was a professional faith-healer. In addition, her husband (Joseph's father) also appeared to have visions. She related how in his "first vision" he walked with "an attendant spirit" who told him of "a certain log box, the contents of which, if you eat thereof, will make you wise, and give you wisdom and understanding". Unfortunately, her husband dropped the box, when he found himself confronted with "all manner of beasts, horned cattle, and roaring animals." (Ibid p 25. see Lucy Smith, BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES OF JOSEPH SMITH THE PROPHET AND HIS PROGENITORS FOR MANY GENERATIONS (Liverpool, England: 1853), p 57) The young Joseph Smith seems to have had a great talent for telling elaborate stories on the American Indians. In her autobiography, Joseph Smith's mother related: "During our evening conversations, Joseph would occasionally give us the most amusing recitals that could be imagined. He would describe the ancient inhabitants of this continent, their dress, mode of traveling, and the animals upon which they rode; their cities, their buildings, with every particular; their mode of warfare; and also their religious worship. This he would do with as much ease, seemingly, as if he had spent his whole life with them." Similarities of the Book of Mormon with the Masonic Legend of the Gold Plate of Enoch Both Joseph Smith and his brother belonged to the Masons. Some Mormon scholars have noted the similarity between the story in the BOOK OF MORMON and the Masonic legend on the gold plate of Enoch--specifically how a buried treasure was believed to have been buried in a sacred hill. (According to the Masonic legend, Enoch was taken up in a vision to a hill named Moriah where he saw a golden plate engraved with unknown characters, buried below. Enoch buried the golden plate, along with a marble pillar containing a hieroglyphic account of the Tower of Babel, and a brass pillar that similarly described the history of creation, in order to preserve them from the Great Flood. Centuries later, King Solomon's builders--the Masons--discovered these buried records while excavating under the foundation of the Great Temple in Jerusalem. These treasures were eventually stored to King Solomon's Temple. (Ibid, p 29) This and other stories of buried treasure (from the Spanish and Indian gold and riches) were very popular in the region while Joseph Smith was growing up. Inscriptions from the Plates themselves. According to Joseph Smith, he was able to make a copy of the original inscriptions on the golden plates, before the plates were taken away to heaven by the angel Moroni. In 1828, Martin Harris, a close associate of Joseph Smith, reportedly took a copy of the BOOK OF MORMON inscriptions to Professor Charles Anthon of Columbia University. According to the Mormon HISTORY OF THE CHURCH, vol 1, pp 19-20), the professor declared the characters to be "true" Egyptian and ancient semitic characters, and that Smith's translation of them was a "correct" and accurate translation. However, according to a letter written by Professor Anthon, (dated February 17,1834), he stated that he was misquoted and had never proclaimed the Mormon inscription as being "reformed Egyptian hieroglyphics." Instead all he saw were "all kinds of crooked characters disposed in columns, and had evidently been prepared by some person who had before him at the time a book containing various alphabets. Greek and Hebrew letters, crosses and flourishes, ...[etc] and evidently copied in such a way as not to betray the source whence it was derived." (Ibid, p 23) quoting Eber D. Howe, MORMONISM UNVAILED). The BOOK OF MORMON does not mention this letter. It was some ten years later, when the Frenchman, Champollion discovered the Rosetta Stone, and published his EGYPTIAN GRAMMER (1835) AND EGYPTIAN DICTIONARY (1841). Champollion's discovery of the Rosetta Stone allowed archeologists to translated Egyptian hieroglyphics into their Greek equivalents. Prior to this time, no one, (including Professor Anthon) knew how to translate Egyptian hieroglyphics.--Since this time, no serious scholar has authenticated Joseph Smith's transcript as containing Egyptian characters. (Ibid p 29, footnote 22) Five years after publishing the BOOK OF MORMON, Joseph Smith bought some Egyptian papyrus scrolls and again used his seer stone to translate them. The result was the BOOK OF ABRAHAM. Historians now know that the papyrus scrolls used by Joseph Smith were funerary scrolls from the Egyptian Book of Breathings (commonly buried with mummies.) One of the papyruses that Joseph Smith purchased was damaged--whereby the picture of the priest had his head missing. When Joseph Smith, in his PEARL OF GREAT PRICE, showed this, he copied the priests body, while substituting his own "guess" of what the head looked like--which he made a crude human head. However, historians know from copies of other papyruses that were NOT damaged, that the real head should have be in the guise of a jackal--ie Anubis the Jackal). That is, despite the use of his magic seer stone, Smith drew this priest with a cartoon-like HUMAN head. (Ibid, p 30) The "Kinderhook Plates" In 1843, six brass plates covered with "hieroglyphics" were discovered at an old earth-mound outside Kinderhook, Illinois. These plates were brought before Joseph Smith, who pronounced them genuine, and who proceeded on to translate them. Joseph Smith recorded this find in his Diary on May 1, 1843 as follows: "I have translated a portion of them and find that they contain the history of the person with whom they were found. He was a descendent of Ham through the loins of Pharaoh, King of Egypt, and that he received his kingdom from the Ruler of heaven and earth." (HISTORY OF THE CHURCH, vol 5, p 372). Photographs of the six plates appear in the HISTORY OF THE CHURCH (Vol 5, pp 374-6) It was later uncovered that these plates were fakes prepared by enemies of Joseph Smith to demonstrate that his "seer" powers were false. In a letter dated June 30, 1879, one of the men who had discovered the plates (named Wilbur Fugate) stated that the plates were a "humbug" and had been cut out of copper, etched with acid, and aged with nitric acid. In 1980, a scientific examination showed that 'Plate No. 5' was indeed a brass alloy "typical of the mid-nineteenth century" which was etched with acid." (Ibid) Mormon scholar Stanley P. Kimball concluded from the results that "The time has come to admit that the Kinderhook plate incident of 1843 was a light-hearted, heavy-handed, frontier-style prank, or 'joke' as the perpetrators themselves called it" (MORMON HISTORY ASSOCIATION NEWSLETTER, June 1981; tests reported in THE ENSIGN, August 1981), Ibid) Analysis of the BOOK OF MORMON The BOOK OF MORMON is written in a style, similar to the King James version of the Bible. For example, note the strong comparisons in the following passages: * "...death and hell delivered up the dead..." [Revelation f20:13] "...death and hell must deliver up their dead...[2 Nephi 6:28(RLDS)] * "...all these worketh that one and the self-same Spirit, dividing to every man severally as he will." [1 Cor. 12:10] "..all these gifts come by the spirit of christ; and they come unto every man severally, according as he will. [Moroni 10:12(RLDS)] * "For, behold the day cometh that shall burn as an oven; and all the proud, yea, and all that do wickedly, shall be stubble; and the day cometh that shall burn them up.... shall the Son of righteousness arise with healings in his wings." "For behold, said the prophet... the day soon cometh that all the proud and they who do wickedly shall be as stubble; and the day cometh that they must be burned." (1 Nephi 22:15) *He shall rise from the dead with healing in his wings. (2 Nephi 25:13) (Ibid, p 26) Interestingly, some passages in the BOOK OF MORMON are anachronistic.-- That is, they show the prophet Nephi (who lived around 550 BC) to be quoting passages by the Old Testament writer Malachi. Malachi lived roughly some one hundred fifty years LATER than Nephi--ie around 400 BC. For example, in Malachi 4:1-2, one finds: Comparison of BOOK OF MORMON with an earlier work--A VIEW OF THE HEBREWS Scholars have noticed that much of the plot in the BOOK OF MORMON appeared in an earlier fiction book, called A VIEW OF THE HEBREWS. Written in 1832-- (some seven years before the BOOK OF MORMON), the A VIEW OF THE HEBREWS was published only forty miles away from the birthplace of Joseph Smith. The following strong parallels between the two books are shown below: (Footnote: All examples were taken from George Smith, op cit pp 25-6) *Both books began their opening chapters with the destruction of Jerusalem, followed by the dispersion and then re-gathering of the tribes of Israel. *Both books described how the hebrew tribes crossed over a sea to reach an uninhabited land "where man never dwelt" (per the A VIEW OF THE HEBREWS, P 75), --"where there never had man been" (per the BOOK OF MORMON, Ether 2:5) * A VIEW OF THE HEBREWS traced the Indians to the "ten tribes of Israel"; the BOOK OF MORMON narrows this down to two main tribes. *Both books heavily quoted the prophet Isaiah. *In both books, the evil tribe(s) destroyed the other civilized, goodly tribe(s). Both books erroneous assume that iron and steel weapons were used by the ancient hebrews. *In A VIEW OF THE HEBREWS, the author quoted the German explorer Baron von Humboldt, who held: "Israel brought into this new continent a considerable degree of civilization; and the better part of them long laboured to maintain it. But others fell into the hunting and consequent savage state; whose barbarous hordes invaded their more civilized brethren, and eventually annihilated most of them" (p 184). (Note, this is the same basic plot as exists in the BOOK OF MORMON.) *In A VIEW OF THE HEBREWS, the savage hebrew tribes had been "judged by God; in the BOOK OF MORMON they were "cursed" of God. *In both books, sacred records had been handed down over the generations, and eventually buried in a hill where they were later found by others. A VIEW OF THE HEBREWS told how some hebrew parchments were "dug up... on Indian Hill (near Pittsfield, Massachusetts)... probably from an Indian grave" and even possibly from a "leading character in Israel" who buried the records with him when he died. The BOOK OF MORMON told much the same story-- where the sacred records were written by the Nephites and buried "in the Hill Cumorah". *Both authors identified the American Indians as the "stick of Joseph or Ephraim" *Both works stressed the importance of the white Christians to reconvert the Indians to Christianity--thus fulfilling the prophecies which were then believed to bring on the millennium. Interesting Parallels In Character Names in the Book of Mormon There are some interesting parallels between the characters in the BOOK of MORMON and the names of character in the life of Joseph Smith: (Ibid, p 24) *Like Joseph Smith, Nephi (the author of the first books) had five brothers. Two of them had the same names--Joseph and Samuel. *Nephi's bad brother, Lemuel has the same name as an enemy of Smith's-- Lemuel Durphee--who signed an affidavit charging Joseph Smith with immoral character in 1833. *Nephi prophesized that a "choice seer" would discover the writings, and that his name would be the same of his father--ie Joseph. Dogma of Mormonism Mormons accept the divine nature of the Bible ("as far as it is translated correctly") and of course the BOOK of MORMON. Much of Mormon's dogma is similar to other conservative Protestant sects. Mormons believe in the three-some personage of the Trinity, and the importance of obeying God's laws. These laws include faith in Jesus Christ, repentance for one's sins, healing through the laying of hands, speaking in tongues, and prophecy/ revelation. Mormons teach that other Christians (who are not Mormon) will go to hell. Interestingly, one unique feature allows Mormons to baptize nonbelievers who have already died-- but who never had the chance to hear or accept the Mormon gospel. Mormons quote I Peter 4:6 for scriptural authority on this matter: "For this cause was the gospel preached also to them that are dead." The baptism is not believed to completely save the soul of the deceased--but faith and repentance must also be present. This has led to the build up by the Church of Latter-Day Saints of possibly the largest genealogical archives in the world--all so that a believer can "save" as many of his/her ancestors as possible. Interesting, some notable non-Mormon celebrities have been "baptized" in this way--such as Abraham Lincoln. Mormonism's Belief in Polygamy (Multiple Wives) One of the more controversial doctrines of Mormonism, was in restoring the ancient practice of polygamy. Mormon women are taught that there is no salvation possible for them, unless they are "sealed" into eternity with a good Mormon male, through the institution of marriage. For this reason, many Mormon women accepted living in plural marriages. Joseph Smith's clerk, William Clayton, recorded the revelation which showed God approved of the practice of restoring the practice of "Moses, Abraham, David and Solomon having many wives and concubines." Excerpts include: "For behold, I reveal unto you a new and everlasting covenant...the law of the priesthood--if any man espouse a virgin and desire to espouse another...he cannot commit adultery for they are given unto him." One portion of the revelation appeared to have been directed at Joseph Smiths's wife, Emma: "A commandment I give unto mine handmaid, Emma Smith, your wife... let mine handmaid, Emma Smith, receive all those that have been given unto my servant Joseph...but if she will not abide by this commandment she shall be destroyed, saith the Lord; for I am the Lord thy God, and will destroy her if she abide not in the law." There is some evidence that Emma was hostile to the idea of sharing her husband with other women.--However, after Joseph Smith was murdered, she denied that Joseph had ever engaged in polygamy. The record shows otherwise. When Joseph Smith had received the above revelation in 1843, Joseph Smith was thirty five and had already taken at least twelve plural wives. At the time, this was kept secret to all, but a few trusted members. (Jenson, H R 6:233-234) Mormon church historian, Andrew Jenson, listed Fanny Alger (a maid to the Smith household) as "one of the first plural wives sealed to the Prophet." ("Plural Marriage", HISTORICAL RECORD, 6 (May 1887): 233, hereafter HR. Alger's proxy marriage to Smith was in 1899 (Thomas M. Tinney, THE ROAY FAMILY OF THE PROPHET JOSEPH SMITH, JR. [Salt Lake City: Green Family Organization, 1973], 41) Other young women became plural wives of Smith's after being told that God had commanded them to do so. Mary Elizabeth Rollins Lightner recalled how when she first met Smith: "the Savior appeared and commanded him to seal me up to everlasting life, gave me to Joseph to be with him in his kingdom." (Fawn M Brodie, NO MAN KNOWS MY HISTORY: THE LIFE OF JOSEPH SMITH, THE MORMON PROPHET, 2nd ed., (New York: Knowpf, 1975) pp. 443-444) Sixteen year old Lucy Walker, who stayed in the household helping Emma with the housework, stated she agreed to marry Smith after he threatened, if she refused, that "the gate [of Heaven] will be closed forever against you." She was married to Smith while Emma was out shopping in St. Louis. (Journal, 100; Newell and Avery, 139 as quoted by George D. Smith "Mormon Plural Marriage, FREE INQUIRY, Summer 1992, Vol 12, No 3 p 36) In a letter to Nancy Rigdon, Joseph Smith tried (unsuccessfully) to talk her into becoming one of his wives, by arguing "Whatever God requires is right, no matter what it is, although we may not see the reason thereof". (JOURNAL OF MORMON HISTORY 5 [1978]. P 32. ibid, p 31) Joseph Smith believed that his status as prophet entitled him to a DROIT DU SEIGNEUR--or right to all the eligible women in the community. As such, some of Smith's marriages were to women who were already married. (For example, on October 27, 1841 Smith married Zina B. Huntington--even though she was already married to Henry Jacobs, and six months pregnant with his child. She remained living with Henry Jacobs.) (George D. Smith, op cit, p 36) Although the plural marriages were kept secret, news of these practices spread outside the Mormon community, creating a public outroar. When in 1844, Joseph Smith (then 39) announced his candidacy for the U.S. Presidency, his rivals made polygamy a campaign issue. Outbreaks of violence followed, and Smith was charged with treason and imprisoned. He was murdered in jail, after it was stormed by an armed mob of men who had blackened their faces to disguise themselves. Afterwards, Joseph Smith was held out as a martyr of the Mormon Church. In 1852, Brigham Young (who had assumed the majority leadership of Mormonism) announced he had received a revelation by Smith on the issue of plural marriages: "if any man espouse a virgin, and desire to espouse another, and the first give her consent, and if he espoused the second, and they are virgins, and have vowed to no other man, then he is justified; he cannot commit adultery...and if he have ten virgins given unto him by this law, he cannot commit adultery, for they belong to him." (One group of Mormons splintered off from Brigham Young's leadership, primarily in opposition to Young's "revelation" on polygamy. Under the son of Joseph Smith, they formed the Reorganized Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints. Their headquarters is in Independence, Missouri--as opposed to Salt Lake City, which is of course the headquarters of the majority sect of Mormonism--the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Therefore the following discussion of polygamy only applies to the majority sect of Mormonism.) During the middle nineteenth century, Mormons held lively debates with other Christian sects, defending the concept of polygamy. They pointed out how the hebrew patriarchs in the Old Testament had multiple wives. They also noted how the New Testament does NOT forbid polygamy. The American author and satirist Mark Twain participated in one such debate with a Mormon on the issue of polygamy. Throughout the debate, Twain sat largely silent, as his Mormon debater went through an elaborate defense of polygamy using extensive quotes from the Bible. Confident that he had won the debate, the Mormon challenged Twain to refute him, stating: "I'll wager you can't cite a SINGLE PASSAGE in the bible which forbids polygamy!" Mark Twain, rose to the challenge: "Sure I can! No man can serve TWO masters!" (The howls of laughter that followed won the debate for Twain.) Polygamy Declared Illegal by the U.S. Supreme Court Because polygamy was no longer an accepted practice within either Christianity or Judaism-- Mormons were often persecuted for these beliefs. The Republican presidential platform of 1856 called for the elimination of "the twin relics of barbarism", meaning slavery AND polygamy. Congress inacted laws stipulating heavy fines and long jail sentences for convicted polygamists. Between 1885 and 1900, over a thousand Mormon men were caught and convicted under these laws. In 1890, the U.S. Supreme Court outlawed the practice of polygamy. Around the time of the 1890 Supreme Court decision, Wilford Woodruff, then head of the Mormon church, received a "divine command" outlawing the practice of multiple wives. Although this has remained the official policy of the Mormon church to this day, polygamy is still practiced among fundamentalist Mormon sects, especially in the back country regions of Utah and Arizona. Conclusion Today virtually all modern historians believe that Indians migrated from Asia via the Bering Stait--and not from ancient hebrews (who were never known for being a strong seafaring people). According to Michael Coe, a noted archaeologist of Yale University, "The bare facts of the matter are that nothing, absolutely nothing, has ever shown up in any New World excavation which would suggest to a dispassionate observer that the Book of Mormon, as claimed by Joseph Smith, is a historical document relating to the history of early migrants to our hemisphere." (DIALOGUE: A JOURNAL OF MORMON THOUGHT, Summer 1973, 46, as cited in Tanner and Tanner, CHANGING WORLD, p. 134) Some Mormon scholars have tried to fit Joseph Smith's story of the hebrew migrations within a small region of the Americas.--However this regionalized view conflicts with the official doctrine of the Mormon Church. For the fact is that the BOOK OF MORMON clearly indicates that ALL the Indians came from ancient Hebrew tribes. And the very foundation of Mormonism rests on the divine (and therefore inerrant) status of the BOOK OF MORMON. The Mormon Church has, of this writing, a membership of over 5 million adherents. Many people have been approached at home, at one time or another, by a young Mormon missionary--as the Church promotes such activities among its members. As for any historical problems associated with Joseph Smith's discovery, the Church has largely side-stepped this, by stressing UNQUESTIONING FAITH and trust in the Mormon leadership. For example the LDS IMPROVEMENT ERA once warned: "Lucifer...wins a great victory when he can get members of the church to speak against their leaders and 'do their own thing.'...When our leaders speak, the thinking has been done." (June, 1945, p 354). In the ENSIGN (August 1979, pp2-3), Apostle N. Eldon Tanner updated this message with, "When the prophet speaks the debate is over." Church president Heber J. Grant was quoted in one Mormon publication: "My boy, you always keep your eye on the President of the Church, and if he ever tells you to do anything, and it is wrong, and you do it, the Lord will bless you for it." (CONFERENCE REPORT, October 1960, p 78), Ibid p 31 footnote 47)